<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Three Phases of Robert Scoble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/</link>
	<description>Aaron Uhrmacher on Social Media Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy "Banana" Schilling</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy "Banana" Schilling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-308</guid>
		<description>&quot;Scoble is no longer the signal, but the noise.&quot;

Outstanding statement!  Well done Aaron.

P.S.  I just to follow Robert on Twitter but gave up following him when I realized that he was just always there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Scoble is no longer the signal, but the noise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Outstanding statement!  Well done Aaron.</p>
<p>P.S.  I just to follow Robert on Twitter but gave up following him when I realized that he was just always there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy "Banana" Schilling</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy "Banana" Schilling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-519</guid>
		<description>&quot;Scoble is no longer the signal, but the noise.&quot;

Outstanding statement!  Well done Aaron.

P.S.  I just to follow Robert on Twitter but gave up following him when I realized that he was just always there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Scoble is no longer the signal, but the noise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Outstanding statement!  Well done Aaron.</p>
<p>P.S.  I just to follow Robert on Twitter but gave up following him when I realized that he was just always there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Uhrmacher</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Uhrmacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Thanks to everyone for your comments so far. 

@ Christian - Yes, we all evolve and yes, I have the choice whether or not to tune in. I&#039;m not disputing Robert&#039;s relevancy, but rather his relevancy to me vs. new voices that are more focused on topics of interest to me. I don&#039;t want to hear about EVERYTHING, even as someone who considers himself an early adopter.

@ Nathan - to be clear, this isn&#039;t taking a potshot at Robert. I have a tremendous amount of respect for what he&#039;s accomplished and I think there is a lot of value in following his updates. For me, though, that value has diminished over the last few years, which is what inspired me to share my thoughts here. 

Regardless, this conversation is probably bigger than Scoble, but I found the evolution of his updates relative to my attention as the inspiration for this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone for your comments so far. </p>
<p>@ Christian &#8211; Yes, we all evolve and yes, I have the choice whether or not to tune in. I&#8217;m not disputing Robert&#8217;s relevancy, but rather his relevancy to me vs. new voices that are more focused on topics of interest to me. I don&#8217;t want to hear about EVERYTHING, even as someone who considers himself an early adopter.</p>
<p>@ Nathan &#8211; to be clear, this isn&#8217;t taking a potshot at Robert. I have a tremendous amount of respect for what he&#8217;s accomplished and I think there is a lot of value in following his updates. For me, though, that value has diminished over the last few years, which is what inspired me to share my thoughts here. </p>
<p>Regardless, this conversation is probably bigger than Scoble, but I found the evolution of his updates relative to my attention as the inspiration for this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Uhrmacher</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Uhrmacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Thanks to everyone for your comments so far. 

@ Christian - Yes, we all evolve and yes, I have the choice whether or not to tune in. I&#039;m not disputing Robert&#039;s relevancy, but rather his relevancy to me vs. new voices that are more focused on topics of interest to me. I don&#039;t want to hear about EVERYTHING, even as someone who considers himself an early adopter.

@ Nathan - to be clear, this isn&#039;t taking a potshot at Robert. I have a tremendous amount of respect for what he&#039;s accomplished and I think there is a lot of value in following his updates. For me, though, that value has diminished over the last few years, which is what inspired me to share my thoughts here. 

Regardless, this conversation is probably bigger than Scoble, but I found the evolution of his updates relative to my attention as the inspiration for this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone for your comments so far. </p>
<p>@ Christian &#8211; Yes, we all evolve and yes, I have the choice whether or not to tune in. I&#8217;m not disputing Robert&#8217;s relevancy, but rather his relevancy to me vs. new voices that are more focused on topics of interest to me. I don&#8217;t want to hear about EVERYTHING, even as someone who considers himself an early adopter.</p>
<p>@ Nathan &#8211; to be clear, this isn&#8217;t taking a potshot at Robert. I have a tremendous amount of respect for what he&#8217;s accomplished and I think there is a lot of value in following his updates. For me, though, that value has diminished over the last few years, which is what inspired me to share my thoughts here. </p>
<p>Regardless, this conversation is probably bigger than Scoble, but I found the evolution of his updates relative to my attention as the inspiration for this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Ketsdever</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Ketsdever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Point taken.  But, is taking pot shots at web celebrities legit now?  Is that the way we live out our brand?  And if passionate and abundant content creation is bad now: what about Chris Brogan, Gary Vaynerchuck, and Justin TV?

Certainly, it might be nice is the material was more focused or less raw.  But what&#039;s wrong with experiments and some of them not being perfect?  I think everybody needs a social media sandbox.

On the issue of culpability: you seem to lay blame at Roberts feet...but why not the people who read him?  Shouldn&#039;t they/you just find a better way to scan?  

Or why not the technology itself?  Or why not Google or web developers as a whole for not developing better filters which help us get past some elements of chaff (or at least what we perceive as chaff/noise)?  All that said, I think your article is well argued and raises important issues and it doesn&#039;t seem that Robert seems scathed in the least. 

The alternative just seems brittle and procrustean.... (on the flip side...I&#039;m glad I don&#039;t have to know what his cat is doing, chasing, eating, throwing up...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken.  But, is taking pot shots at web celebrities legit now?  Is that the way we live out our brand?  And if passionate and abundant content creation is bad now: what about Chris Brogan, Gary Vaynerchuck, and Justin TV?</p>
<p>Certainly, it might be nice is the material was more focused or less raw.  But what&#8217;s wrong with experiments and some of them not being perfect?  I think everybody needs a social media sandbox.</p>
<p>On the issue of culpability: you seem to lay blame at Roberts feet&#8230;but why not the people who read him?  Shouldn&#8217;t they/you just find a better way to scan?  </p>
<p>Or why not the technology itself?  Or why not Google or web developers as a whole for not developing better filters which help us get past some elements of chaff (or at least what we perceive as chaff/noise)?  All that said, I think your article is well argued and raises important issues and it doesn&#8217;t seem that Robert seems scathed in the least. </p>
<p>The alternative just seems brittle and procrustean&#8230;. (on the flip side&#8230;I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t have to know what his cat is doing, chasing, eating, throwing up&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Ketsdever</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Ketsdever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-517</guid>
		<description>Point taken.  But, is taking pot shots at web celebrities legit now?  Is that the way we live out our brand?  And if passionate and abundant content creation is bad now: what about Chris Brogan, Gary Vaynerchuck, and Justin TV?

Certainly, it might be nice is the material was more focused or less raw.  But what&#039;s wrong with experiments and some of them not being perfect?  I think everybody needs a social media sandbox.

On the issue of culpability: you seem to lay blame at Roberts feet...but why not the people who read him?  Shouldn&#039;t they/you just find a better way to scan?  

Or why not the technology itself?  Or why not Google or web developers as a whole for not developing better filters which help us get past some elements of chaff (or at least what we perceive as chaff/noise)?  All that said, I think your article is well argued and raises important issues and it doesn&#039;t seem that Robert seems scathed in the least. 

The alternative just seems brittle and procrustean.... (on the flip side...I&#039;m glad I don&#039;t have to know what his cat is doing, chasing, eating, throwing up...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken.  But, is taking pot shots at web celebrities legit now?  Is that the way we live out our brand?  And if passionate and abundant content creation is bad now: what about Chris Brogan, Gary Vaynerchuck, and Justin TV?</p>
<p>Certainly, it might be nice is the material was more focused or less raw.  But what&#8217;s wrong with experiments and some of them not being perfect?  I think everybody needs a social media sandbox.</p>
<p>On the issue of culpability: you seem to lay blame at Roberts feet&#8230;but why not the people who read him?  Shouldn&#8217;t they/you just find a better way to scan?  </p>
<p>Or why not the technology itself?  Or why not Google or web developers as a whole for not developing better filters which help us get past some elements of chaff (or at least what we perceive as chaff/noise)?  All that said, I think your article is well argued and raises important issues and it doesn&#8217;t seem that Robert seems scathed in the least. </p>
<p>The alternative just seems brittle and procrustean&#8230;. (on the flip side&#8230;I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t have to know what his cat is doing, chasing, eating, throwing up&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-291</guid>
		<description>I agree with this post a lot. I&#039;m relatively new to the world of Blogging and Tweeting (around 6 months) and when I joined the communities associated with these pursuits, Scoble was everywhere. Mentioning things and being mentioned by others, and people really put a lot of weight on what he said so I thought I should too; however I find him not particularly cutting edge, not particularly insightful and not particularly useful. Looking back in time (as best I can) I can see that he was once a social media leader but not so much any more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this post a lot. I&#8217;m relatively new to the world of Blogging and Tweeting (around 6 months) and when I joined the communities associated with these pursuits, Scoble was everywhere. Mentioning things and being mentioned by others, and people really put a lot of weight on what he said so I thought I should too; however I find him not particularly cutting edge, not particularly insightful and not particularly useful. Looking back in time (as best I can) I can see that he was once a social media leader but not so much any more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-516</guid>
		<description>I agree with this post a lot. I&#039;m relatively new to the world of Blogging and Tweeting (around 6 months) and when I joined the communities associated with these pursuits, Scoble was everywhere. Mentioning things and being mentioned by others, and people really put a lot of weight on what he said so I thought I should too; however I find him not particularly cutting edge, not particularly insightful and not particularly useful. Looking back in time (as best I can) I can see that he was once a social media leader but not so much any more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this post a lot. I&#8217;m relatively new to the world of Blogging and Tweeting (around 6 months) and when I joined the communities associated with these pursuits, Scoble was everywhere. Mentioning things and being mentioned by others, and people really put a lot of weight on what he said so I thought I should too; however I find him not particularly cutting edge, not particularly insightful and not particularly useful. Looking back in time (as best I can) I can see that he was once a social media leader but not so much any more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Averill</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Averill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-290</guid>
		<description>You pays your money, you takes your choice. 

Or actually, you don&#039;t have to pay anything. And you don&#039;t have to tune in either.

Personally, I find Scoble informative and still enjoy reading/following him. 

He&#039;s approachable and devoid of some of the arrogance you can often encouter with someone at his level. He&#039;s been a mentor to so many and sometimes it&#039;s tough when you feel you&#039;ve learned all you can from someone. But I suggest you maintain your tabs on Scoble. I think he&#039;ll be relevant for some time to come.

Yes, he&#039;s evolved, but we all do, eh Aaron?

- Christian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pays your money, you takes your choice. </p>
<p>Or actually, you don&#8217;t have to pay anything. And you don&#8217;t have to tune in either.</p>
<p>Personally, I find Scoble informative and still enjoy reading/following him. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s approachable and devoid of some of the arrogance you can often encouter with someone at his level. He&#8217;s been a mentor to so many and sometimes it&#8217;s tough when you feel you&#8217;ve learned all you can from someone. But I suggest you maintain your tabs on Scoble. I think he&#8217;ll be relevant for some time to come.</p>
<p>Yes, he&#8217;s evolved, but we all do, eh Aaron?</p>
<p>- Christian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Averill</title>
		<link>http://DISRUPTology.com/the-three-phases-of-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Averill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://DISRUPTology.com/?p=363#comment-515</guid>
		<description>You pays your money, you takes your choice. 

Or actually, you don&#039;t have to pay anything. And you don&#039;t have to tune in either.

Personally, I find Scoble informative and still enjoy reading/following him. 

He&#039;s approachable and devoid of some of the arrogance you can often encouter with someone at his level. He&#039;s been a mentor to so many and sometimes it&#039;s tough when you feel you&#039;ve learned all you can from someone. But I suggest you maintain your tabs on Scoble. I think he&#039;ll be relevant for some time to come.

Yes, he&#039;s evolved, but we all do, eh Aaron?

- Christian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pays your money, you takes your choice. </p>
<p>Or actually, you don&#8217;t have to pay anything. And you don&#8217;t have to tune in either.</p>
<p>Personally, I find Scoble informative and still enjoy reading/following him. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s approachable and devoid of some of the arrogance you can often encouter with someone at his level. He&#8217;s been a mentor to so many and sometimes it&#8217;s tough when you feel you&#8217;ve learned all you can from someone. But I suggest you maintain your tabs on Scoble. I think he&#8217;ll be relevant for some time to come.</p>
<p>Yes, he&#8217;s evolved, but we all do, eh Aaron?</p>
<p>- Christian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

